Originally titled just “Wealth” and also published in the North American Review in June 1889, Andrew juniorg8.com’s essay “The Gospel the Wealth” is taken into consideration a foundational file in the field of philanthropy. juniorg8.com thought in providing wealth away throughout one’s lifetime, and this essay includes one of his most well known quotes, “The guy who dies for this reason rich die disgraced.” juniorg8.com’s message proceeds to resonate with and inspire leaders and also philanthropists around the world.

You are watching: Which essay did andrew carnegie write?

Download a PDF COPY that “The Gospel of Wealth”

“The Gospel of Wealth”

By Andrew juniorg8.com

The trouble of our period is the proper administration of wealth, so that the ties the brotherhood may still bind with each other the rich and also poor in harmonious relationship. The problems of person life have not just been changed, but revolutionized, within the past few hundred years. In former days there was small difference in between the dwelling, dress, food, and also environment the the chief and those the his retainers. The Indians are today whereby civilized guy then was. Once visiting the Sioux, i was led to the wigwam that the chief. That was just like the rather in exterior appearance, and even in ~ the difference was trifling in between it and those that the poorest of his braves. The contrast between the palace of the millionaire and the cottage of the laborer v us today steps the change which has actually come through civilization. This change, however, is no to it is in deplored, yet welcomed as highly beneficial. It is well, nay, essential for the progression of the race, the the homes of some should be homes for all that is highest and also best in literature and also the arts, and for every the refinements that civilization, rather than that none need to be so. Much far better this good irregularity than global squalor. Without wealth there have the right to be no Mæcenas. The "good old times " were not good old times. Neither understand nor maid was too situated then together to-day. A relapse come old conditions would be destructive to both—not the the very least so come him who serves—and would sweep away world with it. However whether the readjust be for an excellent or ill, the is top top us, past our power to alter, and also therefore to be accepted and also made the ideal of. That is a waste of time to criticize the inevitable.

It is simple to see just how the adjust has come. One illustration will serve for almost every phase of the cause. In the to produce of commodities we have the whole story. It applies to every combinations of person industry, together stimulated and also enlarged by the developments of this scientific age. Formerly posts were made at the domestic hearth or in small shops i beg your pardon formed part of the household. The master and also his apprentices worked side by side, the last living v the master, and also therefore subject to the exact same conditions. As soon as these apprentices rose to it is in masters, there was small or no readjust in their setting of life, and also they, in turn, educated in the same regimen succeeding apprentices. Over there was, dramatically social equality, and also even politics equality, because that those involved in industrial pursuits had actually then tiny or no politics voice in the State.

“The negative enjoy what the rich might not before afford. What were the luxuries have end up being the necessaries the life. The laborer has actually now an ext comforts 보다 the landlord had a couple of generations ago.”

But the inevitable result of together a setting of manufacture was crude short articles at high prices. This particular day the human being obtains assets of fantastic quality at prices which also the generation preceding this would have actually deemed incredible. In the commercial world comparable causes have actually produced similar results, and also the gyeongju is benefits thereby. The poor enjoy what the rich might not prior to afford. What to be the luxuries have become the necessaries of life. The laborer has now much more comforts 보다 the landlord had actually a couple of generations ago. The farmer has an ext luxuries 보다 the landlord had, and is an ext richly clad and much better housed. The landlord has books and also pictures rarer, and also appointments more artistic, than the King can then obtain.

The price we pay for this salutary adjust is, no doubt, great. Us assemble countless operatives in the factory, in the mine, and also in the counting-house, of who the employer have the right to know small or nothing, and also to who the employee is little better than a myth. Every intercourse between them is in ~ an end. Strictly castes room formed, and, as usual, common ignorance breeds mutual distrust. Every caste is without sympathy for the other, and also ready to credit anything disparaging in regard to it. Under the regulation of competition, the employee of thousands is forced into the strictest economies, amongst which the prices paid to labor number prominently, and often over there is friction between the employer and the employed, between capital and labor, between rich and poor. Human society loses homogeneity.

The price which culture pays for the law of competition, favor the price that pays for cheap comforts and luxuries, is additionally great; yet the advantage of this regulation are likewise greater still, because that it is come this legislation that we owe our wonderful material development, which bring improved problems in the train. But, even if it is the law be bright or not, we must say the it, as we speak of the readjust in the problems of guys to i m sorry we have referred: it is here; us cannot evade it; no substitutes for it have actually been found; and also while the regulation may it is in sometimes hard for the individual, it is best for the race, due to the fact that it insures the survive of the fittest in every department. We accept and also welcome therefore, as problems to i m sorry we need to accommodate ourselves, great inequality the environment, the concentration of business, industrial and commercial, in the hands of a few, and the law of competition between these, together being not just beneficial, however essential because that the future progression of the race. Having accepted these, it complies with that there must be an excellent scope for the exercise of special capability in the vendor and in the manufacturer who has to conduct affairs top top a an excellent scale. The this talent for organization and management is rare amongst men is proved by the fact that it invariably secures for its possessor enormous rewards, no issue where or under what regulations or conditions. The proficient in affairs constantly rate the man whose services have the right to be obtained as a companion as not just the very first consideration, but such as to render the concern of his funding scarcely worth considering, for such men soon develop capital; while, without the distinct talent required, capital soon bring away wings. Such men end up being interested in that company or corporations making use of millions; and also estimating only basic interest to be made ~ above the funding invested, that is unpreventable that their earnings must exceed your expenditures, and also that they should accumulate wealth. No one is there any middle floor which such men can occupy, since the great manufacturing or commercial issue which does no earn at least interest upon its funding soon i do not care bankrupt. It must either go forward or loss behind: to was standing still is impossible. It is a condition essential because that its successful procedure that it have to be thus far profitable, and even that, in enhancement to interest on capital, it have to make profit. That is a law, as details as any kind of of the rather named, that males possessed of this peculiar talent because that affair, under the free play of economic forces, must, of necessity, quickly be in receipt of an ext revenue than have the right to be judiciously expended ~ above themselves; and this law is as beneficial for the gyeongju as the others.

Objections to the foundations upon which culture is based space not in order, because the condition of the gyeongju is far better with these than it has actually been with any type of others which have been tried. The the impact of any brand-new substitutes proposed us cannot be sure. The Socialist or Anarchist who looks for to overturn present problems is come be pertained to as attack the structure upon which people itself rests, for human being took its start from the day the the capable, industrious workman claimed to his incompetent and also lazy fellow, "If thou dost no sow, she shalt not reap," and also thus finished primitive communist by separating the drones from the bees. One who research studies this subject will quickly be brought face to challenge with the conclusion that upon the sacredness of property people itself depends--the right of the laborer to his hundreds dollars in the to save bank, and also equally the legal ideal of the millionaire come his millions. Come these that propose come substitute communist for this extreme Individualism the answer, therefore, is: The race has actually tried that. All progression from that barbarous day come the present time has actually resulted indigenous its displacement. No evil, yet good, has come to the race from the accumulation of wealth by those who have actually the capability and energy that develop it. However even if we admit for a minute that it might be much better for the gyeongju to discard its existing foundation, Individualism,—that the is a nobler best that male should labor, no for himself alone, however in and also for a brotherhood of his fellows, and share through them all in common, establish Swedenborg"s idea the Heaven, where, together he says, the angels derive your happiness, not from laboring because that self, however for each other,—even recognize all this, and a enough answer is, This is no evolution, but revolution. The necessitates the an altering of human nature itself a work-related of eons, also if that were great to change it, which we cannot know.

It is no practicable in our day or in ours age. Even if desirable theoretically, it belongs to another and also long-succeeding sociological stratum. Ours duty is through what is practicable now; v the following step possible in ours day and also generation. It is criminal come waste our energies in endeavoring to uproot, when all we have the right to profitably or possibly achieve is to bend the global tree of humankind a small in the direction most favorable to the manufacturing of good fruit under currently circumstances. We might too urge the damage of the greatest existing form of man due to the fact that he failure to reach our ideal as favor the damage of Individualism, personal Property, the regulation of buildup of Wealth, and also the law of Competition; for these space the highest possible results of human being experience, the soil in which culture so far has produced the finest fruit. Unequally or unjustly, perhaps, together these laws sometimes operate, and also imperfect together they show up to the Idealist, they are, nevertheless, favor the highest form of man, the best and also most beneficial of all that humanity has yet accomplished.

We start, then, with a condition of affairs under i m sorry the best interests that the race are promoted, yet which inevitably offers wealth to the few. Therefore far, accepting problems as castle exist, the instance can be surveyed and pronounced good. The inquiry then arises,—and, if the foregoing it is in correct, the is the just question through which we have to deal,—What is the proper mode that administering wide range after the legislations upon which world is founded have thrown it right into the hands of the couple of ? and also it is that this great question that I believe I sell the true solution. It will certainly be interpreted that fortunes room here talked of, not moderate sums saved by numerous years the effort, the return on i m sorry are forced for the comfortable maintenance and also education of families. This is not wealth, yet only competence i m sorry it should be the aim of every to acquire.

There are but three modes in which surplus wealth can be disposed of. The can be left to the family members of the decedents; or it have the right to be bequeathed for public purposes; or, finally, it can be administered throughout their resides by its possessors. Under the first and second modes many of the wealth of the human being that has actually reached the few has hitherto to be applied. Let us in turn take into consideration each of this modes. The very first is the most injudicious. In monarchical countries, the estates and also the greatest section of the wealth room left to the very first son, the the vanity of the parent may be gratified through the assumed that his name and title are to descend to succeeding generations unimpaired. The condition of this course in Europe to-day teaches the futility that such wishes or ambitions. The followers have become impoverished with their follies or native the autumn in the worth of land. Also in great Britain the strict regulation of entail has been uncovered inadequate to preserve the condition of an hereditary class. Its soil is rapidly passing right into the hand of the stranger. Under republican organizations the department of property amongst the kids is much fairer, however the inquiry which forces itself top top thoughtful men in all lands is: Why should men leave good fortunes to your children? If this is done from affection, is it no misguided affection? observation teaches that, typically speaking, the is no well because that the kids that they should be therefore burdened. Neither is that well because that the state. Beyond providing because that the wife and also daughters moderate sources of income, and an extremely moderate allowances indeed, if any, for the sons, men might well hesitate, for it is no much longer questionable that good sums bequeathed oftener work more for the injury than for the good of the recipients. Wise males will soon conclude that, for the finest interests of the members of their families and also of the state, together bequests space an improper usage of your means.

It is not suggested that guys who have actually failed to educate your sons to earn a livelihood shall cast them adrift in poverty. If any kind of man has actually seen right to rear his sons with a see to their living idle lives, or, what is very commendable, has instilled in lock the sentiment that they space in a position to labor for public end without referral to pecuniary considerations, then, the course, the duty the the parental is to view that such are noted for in moderation. There space instances the millionaires" boy unspoiled by wealth, who, gift rich, still perform great services in the community. Such room the an extremely salt of the earth, as beneficial as, unfortunately, they space rare; still that is not the exception, yet the rule, that men must regard, and, looking in ~ the usual result of massive sums conferred ~ above legatees, the thoughtful guy must quickly say, "I would as soon leave to my kid a curse as the almighty dollar," and admit to himself that it is not the welfare the the children, but family pride, which inspires these huge legacies.

As come the second mode, that of leaving wide range at death for publicly uses, it might be stated that this is just a means for the handle of wealth, listed a guy is contents to wait until he is dead before it i do not care of much an excellent in the world. Understanding of the results of legacies bequeathed is not calculated to accumulate the brightest wishes of much posthumous great being accomplished. The situations are not few in which the real object sought by the testator is not attained, nor room they couple of in i beg your pardon his real wishes space thwarted. In many cases the bequests space so used regarding become just monuments that his folly. It is well to remember the it needs the exercise of not less capability than the which gained the wide range to usage it so as to be really helpful to the community. Besides this, that may reasonably be stated that no man is to it is in extolled because that doing what the cannot help doing, no one is that to it is in thanked by the community to which he only leaves wide range at death. Males who leave vast sums in this method may fairly be thought guys who would certainly not have left it at all, had actually they to be able to take it v them. The memories of such cannot be held in grateful remembrance, because that there is no elegant in your gifts. That is not to be wonder at that such bequests it seems ~ so generally to lack the blessing.

The farming disposition come tax an ext and more heavily big estates left at fatality is a cheering point out of the development of a salutary change in publicly opinion. The State that Pennsylvania now takes—subject to some exceptions—one-tenth of the property left by its citizens. The budget plan presented in the British parliament the various other day proposes to boost the death-duties; and, most far-ranging of all, the new tax is to it is in a graduated one. Of all forms of taxation, this seems the wisest. Males who continue hoarding an excellent sums all their lives, the appropriate use of which for - publicly ends would work great to the community, have to be made to feel that the community, in the form of the state, cannot therefore be deprived that its suitable share. By taxing estates greatly at fatality the state marks its blame of the selfish millionaire"s unworthy life.

It is desirable that nations must go much further in this direction. Indeed, it is difficult to collection bounds to the re-publishing of a wealthy man"s legacy which must go at his death to the general public through the firm of the state, and by all means such taxes need to be graduated, beginning at nothing ~ above moderate sums come dependents, and also increasing swiftly as the quantities swell, until of the millionaire"s hoard, together of Shylock"s, at least

"The other halfComes come the privy coffer that the state."

This plan would work-related powerfully come induce the rich man to deal with the management of wealth during his life, i beg your pardon is the end that culture should always have in view, as being that by much most fruitful because that the people. Nor need it it is in feared that this policy would sap the root of enterprise and also render men much less anxious come accumulate, for to the class whose ambitious it is come leave an excellent fortunes and also be talked around after your death, that will lure even much more attention, and, indeed, be a rather nobler ambition to have enormous sums paid end to the state from your fortunes.

There remains, then, just one setting of using great fortunes; but in this we have the true antidote because that the short-term unequal circulation of wealth, the reconciliation of the rich and also the poor—a reign of harmony—another ideal, differing, indeed, from the of the Communist in requiring just the further advancement of existing conditions, no the total overthrow of our civilization. That is started upon the current most extreme individualism, and the race is projected to put it in exercise by level whenever the pleases. Under its persuade we candlestick have perfect state, in i beg your pardon the surplus wealth that the couple of will become, in the finest sense the home of the many, because administered for the typical good, and also this wealth, passing with the hand of the few, deserve to be do a much an ext potent force for the elevation of our race than if it had actually been dispersed in small sums to the human being themselves. Also the poorest have the right to be made to watch this, and also to agree that an excellent sums gathered by few of their fellow-citizens and spent for public purposes, native which the masses enjoy the principal benefit, are more valuable come them 보다 if scattered among them v the course of many years in trifling amounts through the course of numerous years.

If we think about what results circulation from the Cooper Institute, because that instance, come the best portion of the gyeongju in new York no possessed the means, and compare these with those which would certainly have emerged for the great of the masses indigenous an same sum dispersed by Mr. Cooper in his lifetime in the type of wages, i beg your pardon is the highest kind of distribution, being for work-related done and also not for charity, us can type some estimate of the possibilities for the development of the race which lie embedded in the current law the the buildup of wealth. Much of this amount if dispersed in small quantities among the people, would have actually been wasted in the indulgence the appetite, several of it in excess, and also it may be wondered about whether also the component put to the best use, that of adding to the comforts of the home, would have yielded outcomes for the race, together a race, in ~ all equivalent to those which space flowing and are to circulation from the Cooper institute from generation come generation. Allow the support of violent or radical adjust ponder well this thought.

We might even go so far regarding take an additional instance, that of Mr. Tilden"s bequest of 5 millions of dollars for a complimentary library in the city of new York, but in introduce to this one cannot help saying involuntarily, how much far better if Mr. Tilden had specialized the critical years of his own life come the proper administration of this enormous sum; in which situation neither legal dispute nor any kind of other cause of hold-up could have actually interfered v his aims. However let united state assume that Mr. Tilden"s millions finally end up being the way of offering to this city a noble windy library, wherein the treasures of the world contained in books will be open up to every forever, without money and without price. Considering the good of that part of the race which congregates in and also around Manhattan Island, would its permanent advantage have been better promoted had actually these millions been allowed to circulate in little sums through the hands of the masses? also the many strenuous advocate of Communism should entertain a doubt upon this subject. Many of those who think will more than likely entertain no doubt whatever.

Poor and restricted are our opportunities in this life; narrow our horizon; our best work many imperfect; yet rich guys should be thankful for one inestimable boon. They have it in your power throughout their lives to busy themselves in organizing benefactions native which the masses of their fellows will certainly derive lasting advantage, and also thus dignify their very own lives. The highest life is more than likely to it is in reached, no by together imitation of the life that Christ as Count Tolstoi offers us, but, while animated by Christ"s spirit, by recognizing the changed conditions of this age, and also adopting settings of expressing this spirit an ideal to the readjusted conditions under which we live; tho laboring because that the good of our fellows, which was the essence of his life and teaching, but laboring in a various manner.

“This, then, is held to be the duty the the male of Wealth: First, to set an example of modest, unostentatious living, shunning display or extravagance.”

This, then, is held to it is in the duty the the male of Wealth: First, to collection an instance of modest, unostentatious living, shunning display screen or extravagance; to provide moderately for the legitimate desires of those dependent upon him; and also after doing therefore to think about all surplus earnings which come to him just as to trust funds, which he is referred to as upon come administer, and strictly bound as a issue of duty to carry out in the path which, in his judgment, is ideal calculated to develop the most beneficial results because that the community—the guy of wide range thus ending up being the mere agent and also trustee because that his poorer brethren, bringing come their organization his superior wisdom, experience and capacity to administer, doing because that them far better than they would certainly or might do for themselves.

We space met here with the challenge of identify what room moderate sums to leaving to members that the family; what is modest, unostentatious living; what is the test of extravagance. There have to be various standards for various conditions. The price is that it is as difficult to name exact amounts or actions together it is to define great manners, good taste, or the rule of propriety; but, nevertheless, these space verities, famed although indefinable. Public sentiment is fast to know and also to feel what offends these. For this reason in the instance of wealth. The dominion in to the to good taste in the dress of guys or women applies here. Everything makes one conspicuous offends the canon. If any kind of family it is in chiefly well-known for display, for extravagance in home, table, equipage, for substantial sums ostentatiously invested in any form upon itself, if this be its chief distinctions, we have actually no difficulty in estimating that is nature or culture. So similarly in regard come the usage or abuse the its excess wealth, or come generous, freehanded cooperation in an excellent public uses, or come unabated efforts to accumulate and also hoard to the last, even if it is they carry out or bequeath.

The verdict rests v the best and also most enlightened public sentiment. The community will certain judge and its judgments will not often be wrong.

The best uses to which excess wealth can be put have currently been indicated. This who, would carry out wisely must, indeed, it is in wise, for among the serious obstacles to the improvement of our race is indiscriminate charity. It were much better for mankind the the countless the affluent were thrown in to the sea than so spent regarding encourage the slothful, the drunken, the unworthy. The every thousands dollars invested in so called charity to-day, the is probable that $950 is unwisely spent; for this reason spent, indeed regarding produce the an extremely evils which it proposes to minimize or cure. A well-known writer that philosophic publications admitted the other day the he had provided a 4 minutes 1 of a dollar to a male who approached him as he to be coming to visit the home of his friend. The knew nothing of the actions of this beggar; knew no the use that would certainly be make of this money, although he had actually every reason to doubt that it would be spent improperly. This guy professed to be a disciple that Herbert Spencer; however the quarter-dollar offered that night will most likely work more injury than all the money i beg your pardon its thoughtless donor will certainly ever be able to give in true charity will do good. He only gratified his own feelings, saved himself from annoyance,—and this was probably one of the most selfish and very worst action of his life, for in every respects he is many worthy.

In bestowing charity, the main consideration should be to help those who will help themselves; to provide part of the means by which those that desire to boost may execute so; to give those who desire to usage the aids whereby they might rise; to assist, yet rarely or never to do all. Neither the individual nor the race is boosted by almsgiving. Those worthy the assistance, other than in rare cases, hardly ever require assistance. The really an useful men of the race never do, except in situations of accident or suddenly change. Every one has, the course, situations of individuals carried to his own expertise where short-lived assistance can do actual good, and also these he will not overlook. But the quantity which have the right to be wisely provided by the separation, personal, instance for individuals is necessarily restricted by his lack of knowledge of the circumstances associated with each. He is the only true reformer who is together careful and as anxious not to aid the unworthy together he is to assist the worthy, and, perhaps, even much more so, for in alms-giving more injury is more than likely done by rewarding vice than by relieving virtue.

The rich man is therefore almost minimal to complying with the instances of Peter Cooper, Enoch Pratt of Baltimore, Mr. Pratt that Brooklyn, councilor Stanford, and others, who understand that the best method of services the neighborhood is to ar within its with the ladders upon which the aspiring can rise—parks, and way of recreation, through which men are aided in body and mind; works of art, details to provide pleasure and also improve the public taste, and public establishments of various kinds, which will improve the general condition of the people; in this manner return their surplus wealth come the massive of their fellows in the forms best calculated to carry out them lasting good.

See more: The Name Of The Place Is I Like It Like That (The Name Of The Place Is)

“The guy who dies therefore rich dies disgraced.”

Thus is the problem of Rich and Poor to it is in solved. The legislations of build-up will be left free; the regulations of circulation free. Individualism will continue, however the millionaire will be however a trustee for the poor; intrusted because that a season through a good part of the raised wealth the the community, however administering it because that the community far much better than it could or would have done because that itself. The finest minds will certainly thus have actually reached a phase in the development of the race which that is plainly seen the there is no mode of getting rid of of excess wealth creditable to thoughtful and also earnest men right into whose hands it flows save by using it year through year for the basic good. This day already dawns. Yet a little while, and also although, there is no incurring the pity of their fellows, men might die sharers in great business enterprises indigenous which their capital cannot be or has not to be withdrawn, and also is left chiefly at death for public uses, yet the man who dies leaving behind plenty of millions of obtainable wealth, which to be his to provide during life, will certainly pass away " unwept, unhonored, and unsung," no issue to what offers he leaves the dross which he cannot take with him. The such as these the general public verdict will certainly then be: "The male who dies thus rich dies disgraced."

Such, in my opinion, is the true Gospel concerning Wealth, obedience to which is destined some day to deal with the difficulty of the Rich and also the Poor, and to bring "Peace on earth, among men great will."

This essay was originally published in the North American Review (as “Wealth”), Vol. CXLVIII, June 1889. It was reprinted in Andrew juniorg8.com, The Gospel the Wealth and also Other stylish Essays, ed. Andrew C. Kirkland (Cambridge, Mass.: 1962).