Food Security Status of U.S. Households in 2020

Food secure—These households had actually access, at all times, to enough food for an energetic, healthy life for all family

You are watching: Stage 8 aid to the fallen

89.5 percent (116.7 million) of UNITED STATE families were food secure throughout 2020.Unreadjusted from 89.5 percent in 2019.

Downfill chart data in Excel format.

Food insecure—At times during the year, these family were unspecific of having, or unable to obtain, enough food to satisfy the requirements of all their because they had insufficient money or other sources for food. Food-insecure households encompass those through low food security and extremely low food security.

10.5 percent (13.8 million) of U.S. households were food insecure at some time in the time of 2020.Unchanged from 10.5 percent in 2019.

Low food security—These food-insecure households derived sufficient food to stop substantially disrupting their eating patterns or reducing food intake by utilizing a selection of coping strategies, such as eating less varied diets, participating in Federal food assistance programs, or obtaining food from community food pantries.

6.6 percent (8.6 million) of U.S. households had low food defense in 2020.Essentially unadjusted from 6.4 percent in 2019.

Very low food security—In these food-insecure families, normal eating trends of one or even more family were disrupted and food intake was decreased at times throughout the year bereason they had inenough money or other sources for food. 

3.9 percent (5.1 million) of UNITED STATE households had exceptionally low food protection at some time during 2020.Essentially unadjusted from 4.1 percent in 2019.

Food Security Status of UNITED STATE Households via Children in 2020

Among UNITED STATE family through kids under age 18:

85.2 percent of families with children were food secure in 2020.Houseorganize food indefense impacted 14.8 percent of families via kids in 2020. In some of these food-insecure families only adults were food insecure, while in additionally knowledgeable food inprotection.In 7.2 percent of households via, just adults were food insecure.Both and also adults were food insecure in 7.6 percent of family with (2.9 million households).Children are normally safeguarded from considerable reductions in food intake even in households with very low food security. Nevertheless, in around 0.8 percent of households via kids (322,000 households), one or more kid also experienced decreased food intake and also disrupted eating fads at some time during the year.

Downfill chart data in Excel format.

For more indevelopment, view the report: 

Food Inprotection in Households With Children: Prevalence, Severity, and Houseorganize Characteristics, 2010-11

How Many People Lived in Food-Insecure Households?

In 2020:

38.3 million civilization lived in food-insecure families.9.4 million adults lived in families with incredibly low food protection.6.1 million children lived in food-insecure households in which kids, together with adults, were food insecure.584,000 children (0.8 percent of the Nation"s children) lived in households in which one or more child experienced extremely low food protection.

For even more information, view Food Indefense in the U.S.: Frequency of Food Insecurity.

Food Insecurity by Househost Characteristics

The pervasiveness of food inprotection differed significantly among family kinds. Rates of food indefense were better than the nationwide average (10.5 percent) for the complying with groups:

All households via (14.8 percent).Households with under age 6 (15.3 percent).Households with children headed by a solitary woman (27.7 percent) or a solitary guy (16.3 percent).Households through Black, non-Hispanic (21.7 percent) and also Hispanic reference pjuniorg8.comons (17.2 percent; a household recommendation perchild is an adult family member in whose name the housing unit is owned or rented).Households through incomes listed below 185 percent of the poverty thresorganize (28.6 percent; the Federal poverty line was $26,246 for a family of four in 2020).

Download chart data in Excel format

Overall, households via had a dramatically greater price of food inprotection (14.8 percent) than those without kids (8.8 percent). Among family through kids, married couple family had the lowest rate of food inprotection (9.5 percent).The pervasiveness of food insecurity was higher for households located in noncity areas (11.6 percent) and for those in major cities of urban areas (12.7 percent), and lower in suburban and also various other urban areas exterior major cities (8.8 percent).Regionally, the food insecurity price was greater in the South (12.3 percent) than in the Northeast (9.3 percent), West and also Midwest (both 9.5 percent). 

For interenergetic data visualizations, check out Interenergetic Charts and also Highlights.

Very Low Food Security by Household Characteristics

The pervasiveness of extremely low food defense in assorted kinds of households followed a pattern comparable to that observed for food indefense all at once. Very low food protection was more common than the nationwide average (3.9 percent) for the complying with groups:

Households via headed by a solitary womale (8.2 percent).Woguys living alone (5.1 percent) and men living alone (5.7 percent).Households through reference pjuniorg8.comons that are Black, non-Hispanic (8.0 percent) and also Hispanic (5.0 percent).Households via incomes listed below 185 percent of the poverty line (10.8 percent).Households located in major cities of city locations (5.0 percent) and in nonurban locations (4.5 percent).

Downpack chart data in Excel format.

Trends in Prevalence Rates

The prevalence of food inprotection was unchanged from 2019 to 2020, at 10.5 percent. Regarding earlier fads, there was a statistically substantial (at the 90 percent confidence level) decrease in the prevalence of food indefense, from 11.1 percent in 2018 to 10.5 percent in 2019. In 2019, food insecurity was statistically considerably listed below the 11.1 percent pre-recession level of 2007 for the initially time. Year-to-year declines in food indefense from 2014 to 2015 and also 2016 via 2018 were also statistically significant.

The cumulative decline from 2011 (14.9 percent) to 2014 (14.0 percent) was statistically significant. In the previous decade, food indefense boosted from 10.7 percent in 2001 to 11.9 percent in 2004, decreased to about 11 percent in 2005-07, then enhanced substantially in 2008 (to 14.6 percent), and also continued to be fundamentally unchanged (that is, the difference was not statistically significant) at that level in 2009 and 2010.

The prevalence of exceptionally low food protection in 2020 (3.9 percent) was not considerably different from the ubiquity in 2019 (4.1 percent). The ubiquity of exceptionally low food security in 2020 was substantially reduced than the ubiquity in 2018 (4.3 percent). Statistically significant year-to-year declines in extremely low food security occurred from 2014 to 2015 and 2016 to 2017. The pervasiveness of very low food defense was basically unchanged from 2011 (5.7 percent) with 2014. The pervasiveness of incredibly low food security was likewise 5.7 percent in 2008 and 2009. Prior to 2008, the pervasiveness of exceptionally low food security boosted from 3.3 percent in 2001 to 3.9 percent in 2004 and also remained basically unadjusted through 2007 (4.1 percent).

The year-to-year deviations from a continuous downward trend in between 1995 and 2000 include a considerable 2-year cycle that is thought to outcome from seasonal effects on food protection pervasiveness prices. The CPS food defense surveys over this period were conducted in April in odd-numbered years and also August or September in even-numbered years. Measured ubiquity of food indefense was greater in the August/September collections, saying a seasonal-response result. In 2001 and later on years, the surveys were carried out in early December, which stays clear of seasonal effects in interpreting yearly transforms.


Downfill chart data in Excel format.

See more: The Norton Anthology Of African American Literature : Twenty Years Later

State-Level Prevalence of Food Insecurity

Prevalence prices of food inprotection varied significantly from State to State. Data for 3 years, 2018-20, were combined to provide even more trustworthy statistics at the State level. Estimated pervasiveness rates of food inprotection in the time of this 3-year period ranged from 5.7 percent in New Hampshire to 15.3 percent in Mississippi; estimated pervasiveness prices of exceptionally low food defense ranged from 2.3 percent in Minnesota to 6.5 percent in Louisiana.